A Guide to Understanding Shadowless Theme Decks

DISCLAIMER

I am no expert or ex WOTC employee so my findings here are solely based on some critical thinking and gathering of information. Please don’t open your sealed product because you thought I said it was a good idea. I also do not own any of the images posted here. They were taken from miscellaneous websites and ebay postings for informational purposes.

With the recent discovery of the no damage Ninetales in a brushfire theme deck I got the urge to do some research in an attempt to find a correlation with the types of theme deck packaging and shadowless cards within them.

I was hoping to find at least 100 examples of openings to get a good sample size but through all of my research I only managed to find 63 (not including gold strips). So if you have theme decks that you have opened (and are not already on youtube) please add your info here and I will adjust the findings. Even with just 63 examples I found a decent bit of correlation and I’m hoping this thread will continue to grow and we will get more consistent info.

VARIANTS

First, the different variations. From my research I confirmed 4 types of packaging for the English base set theme decks. The variations come in the form of the cellophane wrap and whether it contains the gold pull tab or not, the image on the back of the box with the 3 cards and the damage counters, and the list of contents on the back of the box, particularly the “damage counters” line.

The 1st variant has a very easy to spot gold line around the top of the box. This is the only indicator currently known to guarantee a shadowless deck. If we look at the back of the box, the middle card in the trio is always placed in front or on top of the two energy cards, the list will always say “10 damage counters” and the damage counters will always be present in the photo.


The 2nd variant has exactly the same features as I mentioned in the first variant however it is missing the gold strip along the top of the box.

In the 3rd variant, the middle card in the image is positioned behind the energy cards. Aesthetically, this is the only difference and in my opinion was most likely a quick edit by WOTC after receiving complaints that the back of the box pictured a 1st edition card but none of the cards inside were 1st edition (just a theory).

The 4th variant has the most differences in that the contents list shows “damage counters” instead of “10 damage counters”, the image on the back does not show the damage counters and the middle card is placed back in front of the energy cards. I believe this change was done in preparation for shipment of the theme decks overseas. The foreign theme decks began to feature the cardboard damage counters instead of the “marble” style ones so they removed them from the image and removed the quantity. The USA distributed decks still contained the marble counters, however. I believe that this variation was the last to happen chronologically and my statistics will support this.

STATISTICS AND CORRELATION

Out of the 63 non variation #1 openings I examined, I gathered the following information:

Overgrowth theme decks opened = 20

Variation #2 - 8 unlimited and 5 shadowless
Variation #3 - 4 unlimited and 1 shadowless
Variation #4 - 2 unlimited and 0 shadowless

Blackout theme decks opened = 12

Variation #2 - 6 unlimited and 1 shadowless
Variation #3 - 1 unlimited and 1 shadowless
Variation #2 - 3 unlimited and 0 shadowless

Zap theme decks opened = 18

Variation #2 - 3 unlimited and 6 shadowless
Variation #3 - 2 unlimited and 0 shadowless
Variation #4 - 7 unlimited and 0 shadowless

Brushfire theme decks opened = 13

Variation #2 - 4 unlimited and 3 shadowless
Variation #3 - 4 unlimited and 1 shadowless
Variation #4 - 1 unlimited and 0 shadowless

Total variation quantities:

Variation #2 - 36/63
Variation #3 - 14/63
Variation #4 - 13/63

Percentage of contents in variations to total quantity:

Unlimited variation #2 - 33.33%
Unlimited variation #3 - 17.46%
Unlimited variation #4 - 20.63%
Shadowless variation #2 - 23.81%
Shadowless variation #3 - 4.76%
Shadowless variation #4 - 0%

I was absolutely unable to find an opening of the 4th variation box that contained shadowless cards. Out of 36 total 2nd variation boxes 41.67% of those turned out to be shadowless. Out of 14 total 3rd variation boxes 21.42% contained shadowless cards. Note that those percentages are likely not the chances of those specific variations containing shadowless cards. Some of the videos I examined were of individuals opening decks with prior evidence that they would be shadowless (i.e. they came from a sealed display box that had no WOTC logos on the wrap). So, those percentages will be skewed in favor of shadowless if you look at them as probabilities. It also is just not a large enough of a sample to make assumptions on probability.

CONCLUSION

With this information, my theory is that these variations happened in chronological order as I’ve presented them. 100% of the first variation containing shadowless cards, 41.66% of the 2nd, 21.43% of the 3rd and 0% of the 4th. This would mean that either the 2nd and 3rd variations overlapped each other as wotc was shipping out the last of the shadowless cards or perhaps there were two different facilities producing these boxes at the same time to keep up with demand which lead to the inconsistency. The 4th variation must have come to market last after all shadowless cards had been expended. This supports the change to reflect the new damage counters used in the theme decks shipped overseas which would have been later in the timeline than the initial shipping across the United States.

I hope I laid this out in a way that was easy to understand. If you managed to read the entire book, you’re a trooper. If you have any statistics to add it would be greatly appreciated! Watching 40+ videos of 12 year old kids opening theme decks grew tiresome very quickly. So, I hope at least one person enjoys this information! Thank you!

16 Likes

I think another difference between variant 2 and 3 is where the box has a plastic wrap seal on it. Some have it going down the back and others have a pull tab starting on the side. I think the side pull tab boxes are varient 2, but I’m not 100% sure. I always go for varient #2 when buying decks though.

2 Likes

Good work Chop:)

1 Like

I noticed the vertical seal on just a couple of the videos I examined but I couldn’t gather enough information on that to justify including it as a consistent variation. It seemed random and did not correlate to one or the other so I left it out.

Thank you for pointing that out though. I’ll re-examine the videos that did have the vertical seal to make sure I’m not missing something. It would definitely be nice to confirm that as another variation, especially if we could say undoubtedly what the contents would be in one of those decks.

Thank you!

as an added note to it a few of the theme decks during the 2nd and 3rd variant changed the color of the words and the color of the boxes. but its very slight if you compare it

2 Likes

This is awesome! Great research and thank you for it!

1 Like

Hey I have another stat for you. So I opened one of my variant #2 boxes and I happened to get this :blush:

3 Likes

Hey @chopkins1994 So I opened another zap box snd opened a blackout box. Zap was unlimited and Blackout was shadowless

1 Like

Thank you for sharing! I’ll update the info as soon as I get a chance!

1 Like

ALL Variantion 2 Brushfire deck only:

4/6 Shadowless when deck is on top half
0/6 Shadowless when deck is on lower half and has horizontal strip
0/1 Shadowless when deck is on lower half and has vertical strip

By the deck being on top half or bottom half are you talking about the internal packaging?

Either way thank you for the info! Did you happen to get any no damages out of the 4?

Were any of the top half deck’s vertical strips?

@chopkins1994,
Yes to the internal packaging
No to the No Damage Ninetales :slightly_frowning_face:

@mojotbone, No. I only had 1 vertical strip and it had a deck on the lower half.

2 Likes

@thecharizardauthorty dang I was hopeful for you. It would be nice to know if the error is only in the gold strips or if it’s in others as well. Thanks again for the info!

1 Like

Ok so here’s my question. I notice some of varient 2 have placements inside the box of the cards on top and the rocks on the bottom and vice versa. Does placement of cards and damage counters matter? I read an article that states that cards need to be on the top and damage counters on the bottom but this guide doesn’t mention it. @chopkins1994,@joer,@garyis2000,@legendslugia251,@burritos760,@thecharizardauthorty,@mojotbone,

@lifinestx04, yes, decks should be in top

Yes, TCA noticed that it was much more likely for the deck to be shadowless if it was placed at the top of the box and was the 2nd variant of packaging but it is not a guarantee. I just never got around to updating the guide as that was new information and it would take me several hours of rewatching footage. I have 3 kids so time is tight in general lol

Also @chopkins1994 ,I notice some of the type 2 zap decks say “Theme Deck” either in black writing in the front or blue, also on the back will have black or blue writing depending on the color of the “theme deck” text. Does this mean anything? Is black more shadowless than blue? @joer , @chopkins1994 ,@joer ,@garyis2000 ,@legendslugia251 ,@burritos760 ,@thecharizardauthorty ,@mojotbone , @mojotbone , @thecharizardauthorty , @burritos760 , @legendslugia251 , @garyis2000 ,

I have noticed this before but never could pin point a correlation. There very may well be, I just dont have anything to help you on that part.