Why does Topps Rainbow lag compared to Tekno, Sparkle, & Spectra?

IMG_6598

IMG_6599

Im 33 years old now, so I was right in the prime of my childhood when Pokemon was exploding in the late 90s. From what I remember, most of my collecting was in the base/jungle/fossil era, and part of that is that it was what my friends were collecting and trading.

Occasionally, id receive the Topps cards, usually as a gift from the uninformed. I distinctly remember getting a Charmander Topps Tin for Christmas one year. The cards always really drew me in, and I spent a lot of time looking at them, but were perceived as less valuable for not being “real” or styled less traditionally.

Like many, I phased out of the hobby as I got older. I’ve only recently come back into things.

What has been interesting to me, is that the strongest nostalgia cards aren’t the same ones that were my main chase cards as a kid - it’s actually the Topps cards.

The nostalgia wave first began for me when I saw that same Charmander tin from my childhood, sealed on EBay. It was one of those things that I hadn’t thought about in decades, but as soon as I saw it, it was like people pulled straight back into the living room floor of childhood Christmas, surrounded by wrapping paper and new cards. I hadn’t realized how deeply this was ingrained into the core of my memory, until I saw it again.

After I saw that, I started to do research on the set as a whole. What I came to find, is that I never even really knew what it was as a kid. I didn’t know that there were special packs, collector edition stamps, three different series, and especially all of the different foil types.

I quickly realized that Tekno and sparkle cards were out of my league, and started to focus on spectra. The first thing that really stuck out initially, was that pop data between Tekno sparkle and spectra was much tighter than the pull rates of: 1 in 15 for Tekno, 1 in 10 for sparkle, and 1 in 2 for spectra would suggest. For many cards there is 2-2.5x more spectra than Tekno/sparkle

As I was looking through listings, I was able to see other foil types that I never knew existed. What really shifted for me, was seeing Flareon in a rainbow print. I thought the card looked stunning. I started to look at other rainbow prints, and was amazed at how certain Pokemon looked in the foil. Jolteon/zapdos/electric really stood out, and so did the water Pokemon.

The aesthetic pull made me curious about rarity and population data. I was quite surprised by what I saw. With series 3 rainbows in particular.

The highest submitted Pokémon in that entire group of cards was Dragonite, with a total of 30 entries through PSA. What was maybe even more striking aside from general rarity, was that most of the cards had actually never had a single 10.

I started to crunch the numbers on the actual gem rates between the four (Tekno,sparkle,spectra,rainbow) and from a sample size of 10ish Pokemon in each set, Tekno had a 22 percent gem rate, sparkle 34%, spectra 24%, and rainbow all the way down around 3%

So my question for those of you that have followed Topps longer, why do you think the rainbow foil (series 3 in particular) lags so far behind Tekno and Sparkle?

My initial thought was perhaps it could be due to Tek,Spark,Spec being included in special packs, but then realized to get a rainbow print you had to buy a regular pack with a collectors edition stamp, so not sure if it can be chalked up to that alone.

Would love to hear perspectives from people that collected these closer to release

9 Likes

The rainbow variant is on the Topps base set cardstock prone to scratching and the other variants are Topps Chrome which is more durable and a bit of a premium feel.

8 Likes

Chrome set has very iconic status compared to other topps sets which sets the status quo already, but the chrome cards also have stayed in much better condition because of the different cardstock, regular cards and their weak corners get damaged very easily. Also one thing to condider is that topps chome packs can still be opened now and the cards are pack fresh, but other topps packs are basically ruined as the foil card most likely is stuck to the card next to it

8 Likes

I honestly didn’t realize that Chrome came after series 3 until a few hours ago, haha. This has got to be one of the most confusing card sets to ever exist, but feel like I might finally get it.

That makes sense that it would carry a premium for better cardstock.

It will be interesting to see how this market develops. One thing I noticed today is that even the commons in series 3 (in high psa) are going for decent money, and then realized that they are also quite low in number.

It’s interesting how much a 10 in a more common card can be valued higher than something like Mewtwo rainbow 8, where there are no nines and one ten.

Do you think that this is from registry competition or from just wanting 10s? Still trying to learn, and appreciate all the input

5 Likes

I appreciate the input! That story about your friend punching holes through the cards is a hilarious and accurate representation of the way that many viewed these cards. I actually don’t think I know a single person that was serious about them, so find it interesting that I feel like I need to own these cards 30 years later.

I’ve bought a few spectra and am halfway through a rainbow build, but the more that I look at the common print, the more I realize that’s actually all I had as a kid and is where the true nostalgia lies. At this point, I’m gonna need to build out the whole set. Looks like jimmy isnt going to college after all :confused:

3 Likes

Also i think series 3 was very underprinted compared to earlier sets, i know for sure they are a lot more scarce in europe but that’s most likely the case in other places too

2 Likes