I bought a few CGC slabs this year with the intent of crossgrading and was similarly impressed. I will likely still cross grade some of them, but I intend to have a contained collection of CGC slabs at the end of the day.
Seems like there is plenty of room for critique with that company just like PSA and BGS but Iām glad theyāre in the TCG space ultimately.
I ended up just deciding to cross-collect. I realized that CGC 9.5s were of identical quality to PSA 10s. And ultimately what matters is the card not the label. I think once the broader collecting base comes to realize the quality of CGC 9.5s, the value gap between CGC 9.5s and PSA 10s will close significantly (it will still exist, though).
@zorloth, I agree the quality of the cards on the 9.5ās I have picked up have been on par with PSA in my opinion. I think I will likely stick to CGC cards with crossgrades when buying from them though, as non-quads are often what I would consider PSA 9 quality. That said, if you can inspect closely you can snag some very nice cards for a bargain
Yeah, I think for cross-grading purposes, a CGC 9.5 quad is definitely a better bet. Still, Iād say that CGC 9.5 basics are still on par with PSA 10 quality. I even have some PSA 10s that Iād be willing to bet would get CGC 9s.
My core collection is obviously PSA but I decided that I“ll collect the next set I“m working on (old back japanese) completely in CGC. I really like uniformity within sets, and with these great cases and also with them actually acknowledging well known errors and other things that PSA neglected for ages without reason, I“m gladly supporting them a bit. The gap will eventually close, it“s basically like quad 9.5 bgs cards are more or less equal to psa 10s most of the time, same will happen with cgc for sure.
PWCC is clueless when it comes to labeling cards accurately. Their titles are literally just whatās on the slabās label lol. Like, hereās a Beta Cyclopean Tomb that was incorrectly labeled by PSA but that PWCC is selling as Alpha (with ZERO disclaimer that it was mislabeled). Suffice to say that thereās a 0% chance they would disclose the binder ding if they auctioned off the Aggron. And to make things worse, it wouldnāt be visible through the scans. So the buyer would just get fucked for zero fault of their own. At least with the Cyclopean Tomb, itās obvious that itās mislabeled.
@nospin, thatās very cool! Iāve never seen a Secret Lair artist proof before. To answer your question: Iāve seen multiple CGC-graded artist proofs, so Iām sure they will. Not sure about PSA or BGS off the top of my head.
Iāve graded a Korean Charizard from CP6 with European Grading (European Grading | EG) and the result has surprised me a lot.
I thought the cases looked awful in photographs but I like them even better than PSAās in person. And thereās a really cool feature: you can āscanā the label with your phone (if NFC is activated) and it opens the website on the page of your card so that you donāt have to enter the cert number manually. Also, it makes it much more difficult, if not impossible, to fake slabs from this company.
I graded the card because I wasnāt sure if it was legit and I wanted it authenticated. I donāt think Iāll grade too many more card cause Iām using binders at the moment. But I just wanted to share the positive experience in case that any of you might want to give them a try, especially European collectors.
Disclaimer: I donāt work there or have any connection with the company whatsoever, I just liked their service and am quite impressed
Thanks zorloth, my understanding is that PSA does not. My worry with CGC is I know they are a stickler with signed things, wonāt authenticate unless they personally witness something at an event. No harm in reaching out, but is frustrating as I ordered this directly from the artist, but am sure they will probably not authenticate it.
Having the signature authenticated isnāt important for the secondary market value of MTG cards, though (unless itās a rare sig, which Lucas Graciano isnāt). The signature/sketch on your artist proof are clearly authentic, and if you ever resold the card the market would think so, too.
I recently won this card on auction, and I checked the certification on PSAās website and it showed a completely different card, am I getting scammed or was this an technical error from PSA?