PSA & UV-Damaged Cards

I bought this card off of Fanatics Collect last week.


It appears to be UV-damaged rather than some sort of unique printing error (e.g., ink layer missing or insufficient). This card was submitted as-is and was not UV-damaged after grading, as per the scans at PSA. For reference, here is the normal copy and the recently purchased copy next to each other with the same scanning equipment.


Notice how the UV-damaged copy has silver borders around the art box and for the height/weight. Anything gold/brownish/yellow would degrade quicker than reds, blues, or black ink.


Photodegradation occurs when ionizing UV radiation from the sun breaks down the molecular bonds in ink pigments, leading to fading and discoloration. In terms of ink stability under UV, yellow is the first to fade, then magenta, then cyan, and finally black ink.

Generally, the following ink colors change from ___ to ___
Yellow → Off-White or Beige
Green → Cyan
Blue → Cyan
Red → Orangish then Yellowish then Off-White
Purple → Cyan
Black → Black or Gray








PSA has historically downgraded UV-damaged copies in the past or labeled them as “Authentic.” It leads me to believe that this card was simply overlooked during the grading process because the discoloration is minor and/or aligns aesthetically with the card art.

How should PSA grade UV-damaged cards? Should they add a “UV” qualifier such as PSA 9(UV) or something else entirely? Post your thoughts below. Thanks!

4 Likes

So, having done my own UV light tests years ago and finding the same conclusions as you have here in the present is a good thing. We can in fact, repeat the result, yay science!

On a more serious note, to your question: How should PSA grade UV damaged cards?

I think they should still be gradable, but with a UV qualifier, or a “F” for “faded”. Whatever the official term I don’t think is the issue. What I do find to be an issue is at what point you call out the UV qualification.

Should it be when it is clearly faded? Intentionally or unintentionally? Should a certain percentage of pigmentation be gone that is measurable? Or would it be up to the grader(s) to call out the eye appeal?

I’ll be the first person to say, that a UV or sun faded card is without a doubt damaged or at the very least altered. But I can also see the appeal on certain cards with a loss of pigment.

For sure a “gray” (no pun intended) area. But I would say that UV damage needs to be called out.

2 Likes

sunfade is pwcc in a nutshell (besides that other word :rofl:)

imagine paying some of these prices for these cards :nauseated_face:



and yeah there is defo more these are just the ones i remember off the top of my head recently :rofl:

2 Likes