Look at the bottom corners in regards to the centering. Anybody sending a card like that into PSA in 2026 and is expecting a 10, genuinely good luck to em.
Edit: unless it is Logan Paul.
But that’s still within their standards
Or you’re saying that even though it’s within the standard it failed the ‘eye appeal’ category? Because that makes sense to me
Edit: idky I didn’t even look at the T|B centering. Just kidding about everything
1 Like
Recently, even cards within the 55/45 requirements may not be able to get 10’s.
It depends on individual graders, but I’ve had multiple whole submissions where cards with centering worse than 52/48 basically had a 0% PSA 10 rate. That inconsistency is part of the reason PSA absolutely sucks ass right now.
1 Like
No yeah i think i remember a post you had about that recently. That’s wild. Because honestly even considering the eye appeal I think it still looks great with those dimensions.
1 Like
Yep, I’d agree with what @cwebfan23 said. You can get a card like that to 10, but i’d say the odds of that nowadays are probably 1 out of 20.
The graders are strictly going to be going off a quick eyeball test unless maybe you are sending in a card in PSA’s top tier. (and I first saw that card in a grading reaction video that was sent in at the value bulk tier. lol)
Like I said, I think it is an awesome card too, I just want that same grader grading my cards I send to PSA! 
my 9 has better surface but white dots on corner and a few print lines on back :^)
If that is on the card and not the case, that is crazy. 
Considering all the cards PSA damages when they encapsulate, I’m sure they can find a way to scratch the cases before they scan them too.
2 Likes
Yeah, not 100% in this case. I’d stay away from it though.. lol
1 Like
Looks like a normal CGC 10 to me.
And yes, people cross from CGC to PSA (and vice versa) all the time.
Overwhelming probability is it would just get a PSA 9 bc of the back centering, slight corner whitening, and the dot on the top yellow border, but a PSA 10 isn’t impossible. Certainly should not be expected, though.
2 Likes
Thanks for letting me know. I didnt even realize the dot on the top yellow border
A scratch isn’t outside the guidelines for a 9 though.
I saw a PSA 9 that appeared to have similar deep scratches on the holo; I inquired about them to the seller, who provided a TON of photos (way more than I asked for, lol) to show that it wasn’t on the card, it was just the scan. I’d wager this is a similar situation.
I’ve been noticing this a lot recently, scans not doing the cards justice. Probably time for these companies to start investing in new scanners, because the overload of bad scans of late kinda ruins the purpose of the scans in the first place.
2 Likes
Good luck everyone!! 
1 Like
I wonder if the grader thought it was supposed to be centered like that; like the phone cards:
But then again, the left-right centering is also terrible, so that doesn’t fully explain it.
3 Likes
I think the technical term for what happened here is a whoopsie
1 Like
The grader must have known the person who owns that card. That is wild for a modern cert.
1 Like