Everything we know about the 1st Edition Ivy Pikachu (WotC Black Star Promo #1) release in one place

Wizards Black Star Promos #1 - Pikachu
The regular version of this card, which has no 1st Edition stamp, was released in July 1999 as the first Pokémon League promo. A “1st Edition” version of the card was included in 1st Edition booster packs of the Jungle Expansion.

Trainer Magazine Vol. 2
Released July 1st, 1999, Vol. 2 of the Trainer Magazine included a preview of Pokémon cards soon to be released in the west. Wizards of the Coast released Jungle in the United States just two weeks later on June 16th, 1999.

Text in this graphic reads: “Capture the rare Pikachu card! Look on inside wrapper!”

And this subsequent scan provided by @prochaos.

Each booster pack is marked with the same text alongside its 1st Edition symbol.

It seems unlikely that this text would refer to Jungle Pikachu 60/64, a common rarity card within the set. Since 1st Edition Ivy Pikachu would someday originate from 1st Edition Jungle packs, it seems likely that it was originally intended for this type of release.

The Jungle Blister Jolteon Prototype
This prototype material bears a similar reference to the “rare Pikachu card” contained within the set. This merchandise depicts Jolteon - a Pokémon not featured on Jungle booster packages and not shown in the Trainer Magazine spread. This Jolteon prototype is likely from an earlier point in product planning than the later artwork depicted in Trainer Magazine. This could indicate that the plan to include a “rare Pikachu” survived at least two phases of product development, including the near-final version of the product.



If you want to see this prototype being handled, check out this old video from @TCAGaming. Thank you to Rusty at TCA for documenting this rare material in the first place.

Jungle’s Allegedly Rushed Released
Over the years, many have alleged that the release for WotC’s Jungle expansion was moved up aggressively to compete with an upcoming release from their competitor, Topps, which also utilized the Pokémon license. Reference to this can still be found in this 2017 article posted in PSA’s website:

Reports indicate that the Pokémon Jungle 1st Edition cards were originally slated to be released in August 1999, but the release date was bumped up to June 16, 1999, when WOTC learned that Topps was unveiling Pokémon cards earlier that summer.

This claim used to be featured in the Bulbapedia article on the Jungle expansion as well, but has since been removed. Unfortunately I am not been able to find a proper source for this claim, but its persistence as common knowledge suggests there might be one out there. If you can find a primary source documenting this scheduling change, please post it here!

If true, the rushed release timeline for Jungle could be a factor as to why this promotion was altered or why cards were eventually released without proper promotion.

Distribution via 1st Edition Jungle Boosters
Despite reference to a rare Pikachu not being present on the final product packaging, 1st Edition Pikachu #1 promos could still be found in these packs. An uncut sheet of Jungle has never been found that includes a Pikachu #1 promo, suggesting that these cards were likely printed and cut separately before being inserted into booster packs.

These cards emerge from Jungle boosters unpredictably. Sometimes there is only one in the package, but other times there are more. As fellow member @joer once shared, a pair of streamers in 2021 pulled three sets of three Pikachu from a pack opening event. The cards occupied slots in the packs typically held by uncommon cards.

While the content clip itself is no longer available, thankfully these images were shared in the original thread:

image
image
image
image

The inconsistent nature of the release suggests the cards were loaded into packs without oversight, resulting in an uneven and haphazard distribution.

Official Acknowledgement from Wizards
Collectors have speculated whether the inclusion of this Pikachu promo in Jungle packs was intentional or not, but Wizards indicated the release was a mistake in the Thurs. March 23, 2000 Pokémon TCG chat. These chat logs are documented here.

Still Seeking Information

  • I would like to find and document more information about the allegedly rushed release of Jungle and how this could have contributed to this error.

  • I would love a primary source to someday clarify the intentions of this promo and at what point plans were changed.

  • To my knowledge, this is the only instance of an “error” card packaged alongside correct cards without sharing real estate on an uncut sheet. How and when were these introduced to the assembly line for packaging?

  • Was the card printed for Jungle always intended to have a 1st Edition stamp or is this a result of the distribution error?

  • The language used in the unreleased mocks (“Catch the rare Pikachu card! Look on inside wrapper!”) is extremely strange, even considering it is an early draft. All cards are inside the wrapper. The directness of the language suggests to a consumer that the card is definitely in the package, not possibly in the package. The space before the exclamation point is a conspicuous typo. The sentence feels like it was written by someone whose first language was not English - I’ve always found it really odd. Why was this promotional text so… unusual across multiple iterations of the packaging design?

Special Thanks:
From 2020 to 2022, this card was routinely discussed in this thread here. I’d like to acknowledge and thank @styluspt for their enthusiasm in discussing this card previously.

I’d also like to thank @scratchdesk for their work in documenting the WotC chat logs on this site, something I cannot find anywhere else. Even as members come and go, this sort of documentation lives forever and enriches the hobby and benefits collectors for years to come. It is work like this that exemplifies how we are all working together.

36 Likes

Great write up again!

I’ve always found it hard to believe when they say it was unintentional when the early packs have that message on them. If I had to guess I would say it wasn’t released in the packs as intended so they didn’t want to admit to that.

2 Likes

My personal belief is…

  • The card was intended for release in 1st Edition Jungle boosters.
  • The card was printed for this purpose.
  • The plan to include the card was scrapped shortly before release.
  • The printed cards were inadvertently included due to either a misunderstanding or carelessness.

Communication was probably poor, quality control was known to poor, and every account we have from WotC employees at the time suggests they were constantly rushing and changing plans where nobody necessarily knew what was going to happen next.

I work at a company that prints a catalog and it’s not uncommon for our catalog to have errors. Item numbers can be incorrect, product images can be wrong, items that were initially slated for release but were canceled still show up in the catalog, items added late to the release calendar are inadvertently omitted, etc. Since these things are all handled by different people all attempting to meet their own deadlines. It is easy for these mistakes to happen even in this day and age. I am sure it was even harder in the 90s when you were working with a highly esoteric property like Pokémon.

9 Likes

100% agree with your thoughts. Interesting to hear the perspective from your job. Thanks!

3 Likes

This is one of my favorite mysteries in early Pokémon. Have any been graded and acknowledged by grading companies?

2 Likes

Yes

https://www.psacard.com/auctionprices/tcg-cards/1999-pokemon-league-promo/pikachu/summary/1825355

3 Likes

Those packaging mock ups were done for trade shows like the New York Toy Fair.
Their purpose is marketing upcoming products, to mass market wholesale buyers, like Walmart, Target, Toys R Us, KayBee Toys, Electronics Boutique, etc.
The WotC representatives just need something colorful that will catch the eye of potential customers and generate excitement.
Because it’s a mock up for an upcoming product, everyone understands that it doesn’t necessarily represent the final design. The wholesale buyer doesn’t really care which Pokémon appears on the package, they just need to understand that one will be there.
These aren’t created for design approval, they’re just part of wholesale marketing.

I’m pretty sure that I heard this story directly from Peter Adkison, who was the CEO of WotC.
He mentioned it in one or more YouTube videos, where he tells the popular story of founding WotC, making Magic The Gathering, buying Dungeons & Dragons, Licensing worldwide Pokemon manufacturing & distribution, and selling WotC to Hasbro.
It might be this 2012 Ropecon video, or it might be another video. Everyone asks him to tell this story.
https://youtu.be/01oO_Stvc_o?si=0Q-MtUSUx9Am6l1s

I agree. For this, I can only offer speculation, but I’m thinking that the plan was to have instructions inside the wrapper for how to acquire the Pikachu promo card.
The instructions would always be inside the wrapper, and you had to follow those instructions to acquire the promo. The instructions could be something like mail order with UPC proof of purchase, or the instructions could be directing people how to participate in the first Pokémon League.
The instructions were probably intended to lead you to the regular Pikachu black star promo, not to the first edition variant that WotC confirmed was not supposed to be inside Jungle Boosters.

Each sheet of Pokémon cards requires multiple printing plates.
art black, cyan, magenta, yellow, text black, border yellow
Instead of making those 6 plates for 1st Edition, and another 6 plates for Unlimited, they make 6 plates that can be used for both, and 1 extra plate for the 1st Edition stamp.
The fact that this Pikachu promo exists with and without a 1st Edition stamp, tells me that this promo is very likely not printed on a sheet by itself, but is instead on a sheet with other cards that had a 1st Edition stamp.
Quite a bit during this era, WotC would put promo cards on the otherwise unused space of regular sheets.
The promo cards would get pulled aside when the sheet was cut, and at this point they have square corners.
The promo cards stamped 1st Edition were likely intended to be destroyed, they exist only because they were on the sheet.
The sheets that didn’t receive the 1st Edition stamp, should be where the intended promo cards came from.

The packaging machine has separate chutes for common, uncommon, rare, & holo cards.
If I remember correctly, the common chute spits out 7 cards, uncommon 3 cards, rare 1 card, and every 3rd pack gets a holo instead of a rare.
Workers have to load the appropriate cards into each chute.
If they accidentally load some of the 1st Edition Pikachu Promo cards into one of the chutes, those cards will go into packs.
If the worker accidentally loaded square corner cards intended for destruction into the chute, we’d probably see the cards in more than 3 packs of the box.

The other possibility, is that some of the 1st Edition Pikachu Promo cards didn’t get pulled aside for disposal during sheet cutting, so they went through corner rounding, and ended up in packs. This doesn’t require the packaging chutes to be loaded incorrectly.
I didn’t see the opening video, but considering that it was only 3 packs in the box, with some space between the time stamps, this second possibility seems more likely to me.
Explaining how the cutting machine collates the cards is a bit complicated to type here right now, but it helps explain why most packs in that box don’t have the Ivy Pikachu.

Hopefully that helps a little.

5 Likes

Did they eventually put the text on the black plate? I’ve seen some errors that affect both, like liquid obstructions or whatever. It only affects black, but it would be black text and black art. I’m just not sure when they would have possibly done it

They CAN put the art black and text black both on a single plate, but I don’t know if they did, when, or how often.
The fine print on the edges of uncut sheets, should tell you how that specific sheet was created.
How they handle the black is a decision they have to make, which depends on several other factors.
Typically ink is applied from dark to light KCMY, to limit the lighter colors being obscured by the darker colors.
If the image has text, the lighter colors on top of the text, can make the text more difficult to read.
One solution is to “knockout” the other colors where the black text should be, but any color registration issues will then reveal a white (unprinted cardstock) halo around the edges of the text, which also doesn’t look great.
Another solution is to split the black into two separate printing plates, so that the text can be applied last, while minimizing the art black obscuring the other colors.
Putting all the black on a single plate that’s applied last, would be an unusual choice, but it might make sense if the cards just don’t have much black ink, and/or have a cartoon appearance with black lines between the other bright colors. Pokémon might be well suited for that. You wouldn’t want to do that if some of the cards were primarily black, or if the artwork was realistic and required subtle blending of colors and shadows.
On top of all that, Pokémon has an extra plate at the end for border yellow, which is a different ink color than the other yellow.

4 Likes

Ive noticed that halo effect with foils under UV, the words have an actual halo that glows around them on certain prints so im glad you mentioned that.

I think they def put newer stuff on the same plate but older i feel was likely seperate. I feel like the stamps may even have been a seperate plate at some point too.

1 Like

Misprints are a great way to decipher how the colors are layered.

3 Likes

I’m not quite following along with the printing process, but let me offer this holo shift as a possible clue.

The circle in the top left of the card is actually the holo layer. So I guess it’s missing white, yellow, and black?

1 Like

I believe this is a misaligned white layer if I understand it correctly

I’ve never seen that do before, but it looks like it should be around the alignment dots

Is there a picture of the rest of the card?

1 Like

I have some additional data to add to this. You are well familiar with these. I acquired a GodBook which shows the 1st ed error Pikachu promo. It also shows a second error, the 1st ed Jigglypuff promo which I have been wondering if any cards exist. None have ever surfaced to my knowledge but this potentially indicates there may be one out there.

3 Likes

It makes sense that the Ivy Pikachu would be in the Jungle god book, thanks for showing the cover.

The next piece of evidence to look for, is probably an uncut sheet (with or without 1st Edition stamp).
If both promo cards are on the same sheet, then they probably both existed with a 1st Edition stamp.
The Jigglypuff with stamp may have all been destroyed as intended.

2 Likes

For non-holo cards, I think border yellow is the only color applied to the border area.
It’s just unprinted white cardstock beneath.

For holo cards, there’s white ink to hide the foil layer, and then yellow on top of that.
So being able to see holo material on the yellow border, means that white ink & border yellow ink are missing from that area.

The size and shape of that circle strongly resembles the “alignment dot” used as a cutting guide, which is an intentionally created shape that indicates where the sheet should be cut.
Sometimes it’s a little circle o, and sometimes it’s a plus sign +.
But it’s supposed to be on the area of the card which gets removed by the corner rounder.
I’ve seen them misplaced before, which is an error that occurs at WotC while the sheet layout is being created. That error gets duplicated on the printing plate, and appears on every sheet printed with that plate.
If that’s what happened here, this should be a fairly common error.

The other option is that it’s a Printer Hickey, caused by small debris on the press.
I explain Printer Hickies, and demonstrate how they happen in this video.
https://youtu.be/4LH29XXCcts?si=nN2CNbBcRUBlfx62
A Printer Hickey is a temporary error that occurs at the print facility, so fewer copies would be printed than a design error at WotC.

Because of the perfect shape and proximity to the corner, I’m thinking it’s probably a design error, but how easy it is to find duplicate examples would help indicate how it was created.

3 Likes

Oh, I see now that the white printing is shifted down into the artwork box.
Yes, you’re correct on this. :slightly_smiling_face:
The little circle I was looking at, is definitely the alignment dot for cutting the sheet, but it wasn’t misplaced at WotC during sheet layout, the white ink layer was shifted during printing.
The border yellow ink probably isn’t missing at all, it just doesn’t cover the holo very well without the white layer where the circle is visible.

3 Likes

I get the impression this isn’t a normal alignment dot, looks like it may be printed with the white layer and that circle should be around the actual alignment dot to be within the acceptable margin of error for the cut. Card is still aligned and cut straight, only the opaque layer is off.

So circle alignment dot is for printing and not so much cutting i guess im trying to say

No, it’s for cutting.
It marks the intersection of four cards.

The printing alignment (it’s called registration) is measured and monitored with the color bars on the sheet edge.

1 Like

Have we seen an uncut sheet with a 1st Edition Ivy Pika yet? Only a pika in the top left corner amongst the other 120 cards.

Also if anyone is interested in errors, the butterfree ‘d’ error is on row 1, column 8. I remember seeing a stain haunter on one fossil sheet, so there are errors unique to sheets, but the sheets are mass produced.

https://comics.ha.com/itm/memorabilia/trading-cards/pokemon-1st-edition-jungle-uncut-sheet-with-ivy-pikachu-black-star-promo-wizards-of-the-coast-1999-/p/7431-37001.s?ic4=GalleryView-Thumbnail-071515#

4 Likes