Another has joined the market. Not familiar with the seller though. Last sale looks to be enticing sellers considering previous sale gaps and prior market availability.
I don’t understand how someone can list something so valuable without any pictures of the back. I mean, they’re going to be getting messaged for pictures so why not just put them up
I actually just submitted my second near mint 1st Ed Lugia 9/111, am expecting a 7 on this. I will say it is more difficult to sell 7’s if 9’s are only slightly more. But with looks such as 1st ed Charizard 4/102, a 7 costing $5000 may attract many collectors who aren’t interested in paying double that for a 9 example.
He was the 41st graded. Clearly not a collector. Was liquidating his collection raw earlier this year, either someone enticed him to send in or the prices did
Either:
1 - he’s trying to hide the back (which is stupid, because as you say for any card this expensive any serious potential buyer will want to see the back, just like with the “Shy backside” Charizard that’s still listed on eBay.
2 - The seller is so used to listing lower value cards this way without showing the back they’re not really processing that when cards are this expensive it’s a different beast and people won’t buy them the same way they buyer lower value cards.
He also has a PSA 9 FRLG charizard EX. He never responded to my request for a picture of the back
He has a back picture for his blaine’s moltres psa 10 but not the neo lugia 10… shady
Once upon a time . . . (sadly, most of the extra’s departed my collection long ago)

I don’t get it either. Unless the back is damaged after receiving it’s grade there is nothing to hide. Strong 10 or weak 10 its still a 10 though. Value stands but paying premium is I am sure unlikely. Especially if the seller is not willing to cater to the buyer by showing something as simple as the back of a card that PSA deemed a 10.
but it’s a 4xxxx cert!!! I kid, I kid…