The group of people pumping these cards sure have their hands deep inside PSA to get the label changed 2x in the past few months.
That’s actually a disgrace. Luckily I couldn’t give two shits about PSA grading anymore but if I was actively collecting these things I’d be outraged. You can’t just keep changing the label. Love how historically they’d refuse to take objective research info in from experts or acknowledge anything, but now they’ll just change it because wealthy people ask them to arbitrarily.
Thats a good catch so now after XX years they may be making an effort as of now lol
They have tied the new label to the same pop report so at best the newest additions 17 will be correct (maybe) but still many old non glossy in the report.
I like the new label better than just “November” which was confusing for a card released in October. But finally fixing “1999 Pokémon Game” definitely would have been appreciated 
A true 1998 lottery Jigglypuff should be distinguishable if it’s in an unpeeled state.
Because still next to the corrected Pikachu? Did they come side by side for lottery?
The slab of an unpeeled 1998 lottery Jigglypuff should look very different, not only is it side by side the 1998 lottery pikachu, but the back of the unpeeled slab is white.
My understanding is based on this topic: