Any chance you can upload a picture of front and back with entire case in the shot?
I mean it shouldn’t bother anyone as much as it seemingly does IMO.
A scrupulous buyer will buy the card and not the grade so they won’t be caught up overpaying for a so called “weak 10”. PSA are the industry leading professionals so theoretically for many cards they shouldn’t get a 10 no matter how many trips they take through PSA and the only effect is padding their submission numbers and 9 pops. I guess the biggest worriers would be owners of PSA 10 1st edition and shadowless base charizards in that theoretically their cards may be devalued? If I were an owner of either of those cards I wouldn’t be too worried especially given the ongoing POP tracking of @hazard24 and how few new 10’s have entered the pop for each base zard in the past 7 months.
As much as they would like to say regrades/crossovers have little bias vs cracked raw submissions they most certainly do. If the card is truly undergraded your chances of upgrading go way up when submitted raw but you also take a HUGE risk that you, they or transit damage it. I’ve personally sent several thousands of cards to PSA and don’t bother to crossover/regrade anymore because of the bias. Of the several thousands of cards I’ve sent in to PSA I’ve maybe cracked 50 over the years with almost all being a 9 trying to get a 10 that I feel we’re flawless. Only a couple have ever downgraded to an 8, most stay the same but I have upgraded several decent value cards to a 10 and they truly were deserving. Some people hate the idea of people resubmitting cards over and over and I’ve never resubmitted the same card more than 1 time because at some point the grade is the grade. Personally I don’t have a problem with people keeping PSA honest in isolated incidents and if you submit several thousand cards your going to question a lot more than 50 cards. Just my 2 cents on regrading. All that being said I don’t have quite as much experience with crossovers/ crack outs going from BGS to PSA or vice versa
Heard the story about this but can’t verify 100%. I would like to see the PSA 9 case and card to confirm it was indeed the same card that just recently got the BGS 10. There was some confusion on IG between two different Shadowless Charizards so I would need to see the evidence for myself.
Fake news eh lol. You’re probably right.
is there any evidence to this story or was it pulled straight out of OP’s ass?
It could be true. I wouldn’t be surprised if PSA gave it a 9 on centering alone.
I feel BGS were generous giving the centering 9.5 as I’ve seen similar cards earn a 9 subor even 8.5. We don’t see the back though.
The guy has written this and also the screenshot of the result of bgs. Then given the controversy he removed the post and also this old post from 9 of 1 year ago
Anyway personally, I have not said that Pristine is not right or not. I am neither in one nor in another part. A comment before is summon of what I think personally: It’s almost as if grading cards is a subjective process. Anyway thanks a lot for your opinions i appreciate it a lot 
What’s more likely to believe: PSA was overly harsh on minor centering, or BGS screwed up and missed something which the photos aren’t showing?
Probably Beckett mistake