Can someone ELI5? I’ve been lurking and reading but brain still scrambled.
TLDR: We like em thick around here.
Thanks for the replies regarding the stamps!
Some other throughts and questions:
I think it’s interesting that the back and front angles are mirrored at -/+ 15 degrees (but never the same(?)).
If the sheets were printed one side at a time on the same printer, shouldn’t the pattern be in the same angle on both sides?
Or were the cards printed front and back at the same time (basically double-sided printing)? In my mind this would create a mirrored pattern between back and front in the same printer.
If double-sided printing caused this effect, I suppose just flipping the order of which side is back or front in the printer would create the same angle but reversed. I.e thick stamps would be -15/+15 and thin stamps +15/-15 (back/front).
Sorry for rambling, just find this very interesting
It goes deep and they do change around. Ive seen all combinations in base through base fossil
I feel like the “true first” versus the “stamped true first” is a distinction that while important to hard-core collectors, won’t matter much to those are who are not in the know or understanding, like how shadowless or 1999-2000 are not understood or valued nearly as much as they should be, compared to unlimited.
The cards which were printed on the sheets for the original 1st ed (thick stamps) seem to have a distinct ink pattern that can identify them among any non-stamped or potentially thin stamped cards.
Ah ok.
After reading some more I find it kind of complex. But it seems like the dot matrix is determined when the plates are made, so I’m guessing those are the key.
Little more research for anyone keeping track.
Checked 100+ Base unlimited non-holos and 12 of them have -15 backs, while the rest are all the expected +15.
Also checked 4th Print. Interestingly, the holos are all +15, while every single non-holo (around 30 checked) are -15. So 4th Print is the inverse to what we are seeing with 1st editions.
Went over all this in my hour long video😅
Uk is -15 so thats not unusual, not all 4th print are. Only 4th print holos ive seen with -15 backs are usa….
May be some others but havent identified yet 100%. Foils are tough.
Haven’t looked at cards myself yet but it seems pokemon cards follow the conventional technique to avoid artefacts. I assume yellow is always 90 and black 45 degrees (due to symmetry) while cyan and magenta is 15/75 or 75/15 (which is just another way to write -/+15). No idea why they switch though but might just be a 50/50 choice when they make the plates??
My understanding is it varied based on the software that was casting the printing plates
Whoops My fault for just reading through the thread!
Can you direct me to the video, please?
So for thick stamp holos this would be another way to determine if they’re authentic and not just a shadowless with a 1st ed stamp presumably? assuming we get enough data to prove this?
That would be correct for all the holos except for the 4 alpha shadowless cards (Hitmonchan, Ninetales, Gyarados, Mewtwo) that were printed without the 1st Ed thick stamps but still have the -/- magenta. Technically, someone can add a fake thick stamp on those.
Correct. @OCDCompletist
The man who originally pointed it out
makes sense! Always good to have multiple ways to check, I always worry about the 1st ed holos (thick stamps in this case) even if I am almost certain they’re good. Thanks. Glad I found this and was able to check my own.
It’s really kudos to @Nightvulture for noticing the + or - colors that helped differentiate print runs. All this stemming from trying to figure out all the Base 2000 prints lol
Every little thing helps when trying to ensure authenticity! Unfortunately, my 1st Ed Base are a hodgepodge of thick and thin stamps so I’m fighting the urge to get all thick lol but I guess without the hodgepodge we wouldn’t have made the correlation of + and - backs.
I eventually may have found my 2 theme deck cards but even then wouldnt have known where they coulda come from