Lately, I’ve seen a lot of bgs 9.5 (most of them are 3x 9.5 and 1x 9 subs) and sellers always put “PSA 10 potent, PSA 10 controvertible” and other crap. Don’t they know, that to get a crossover you need a quad 9.5 and even then it’s not 100%. Or they know and just try to bs people.
This is all the residual effect of the last decade of new collectors creating the “strong/weak” category. I started grading Pokémon cards in 1998. For the next 10 years nobody even mentioned strong/weak. Sometimes you got a surprise 10 and other times a disappointing 8. It evened out. The grade was the grade. I don’t recall even once getting asked for “extra pictures”. As long as we could see the label All was well.
Now the grade is picked apart like a rabbit after the vulture gets done with it. It takes some of the satisfaction and fun out of it on both the buyers and the sellers end.
Yes, but sometimes I really wonder how the heck this card got 10? OCed and with visible to the naked eye edge wear. Did PSA standards went down or do they just hire lazy-ass employees and pay them minimal wage?
I’ll address this: in my many years of experience I have noticed a drop off from when the new clam shell case was introduced with the foil security stamp. If I have a choice between the two I would always pick the older one.the question is why? Maybe it’s partly due to the increase in submissions.