This is about where I land as well, Ive talked with a few people and have thought about this a lot over the last few hours. I still have no explanation or comment about printing defects, but maybe the prototyping of the cards themselves is more fluid than CGC has classified with these sets. Looking back to something like Shizzle’s post here there are still more variations and differences we haven’t seen yet.
Related topics
Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
---|---|---|---|---|
I’ve lost count of the prototypes | 94 | 2600 | September 3, 2024 | |
Not a Fan of Pokémon Prototypes. You? | 114 | 2179 | January 28, 2025 | |
CGCs Article on Magic & Wizards | 32 | 572 | February 1, 2025 | |
Akabane & Extra Trophy Cards | 86 | 1571 | May 18, 2025 | |
Playtest cards graded by CGC | 24 | 1532 | July 21, 2024 |