I collect Pokemon mainly to enjoy and display attractive cards in nice condition. Value growth is a bonus, not the priority.
Across a few sets, I already have all the holos in PSA 9, plus some PSA 9 non-holos. But many PSA cards I’ve been tracking have doubled in price or more, while CGC/BGS 9 copies can cost half as much or less.
I’m torn between paying extra for consistency and buying whichever copy looks best for the money. I like matching slabs for display and photos, especially within evolution lines. I also wonder whether complete PSA sets might command a premium, but finishing everything in PSA is getting harder to justify.
The card itself matters too. Some CGC copies I’ve considered had scratches that bothered me, but some of my PSA 9s also have defects I wouldn’t expect at that grade. Meanwhile, I own BGS cards with nicer colour and cleaner surfaces than their PSA equivalents.
One compromise would be to keep the holos in PSA 9 and collect all non-holos in CGC 9, giving each category a consistent look. However, that would mean selling and replacing PSA non-holos I already own.
I don’t plan to sell my collection, but circumstances can change, and the collection could eventually supplement my retirement. PSA’s resale premium is a consideration, though I’m unsure it justifies paying so much more upfront.
If you’ve mixed graders, did it bother you over time? I worry I’d eventually see CGC/BGS cards as “lesser,” despite liking the cards and appreciating the savings. I also worry that further PSA price increases could put completing the sets out of reach. But if I earn more in a few years, I might regret settling for CGC just to save money now.
If you paid extra for matching slabs, was it worth it? Any regrets about either approach?