Beckett B.G.S 9.5 Gem Mint compared to PSA 10

I appreciate everyones input. Im trying to critique what everyone says in order to get the answers Im looking for. So Im not disagreeing with anyone here because you all have a point. If I question your answers its for my benefit.

The questions I asked were specifically for a 1st Ed. Neo Gen Lugia and 1st Ed. Neo Gen Typhlosion and the shadowless or 1st ed english Charizard. Some people got a little off topic but I was asking for those specific cards! Would these cards be an exception seeing as though getting Gem Mint status is almost impossible for them cuz theyre such low pop in Gem Mint. I agree what everyone said on the basis of all other cards.

And I also agree with tcagaming in saying it can be a good investment if you do it the right way. I remember watching a video of his and he mentioned he got a charizard “for position only” 9.5 bgs and stated how a he bought it because at the end of the day its a Gem Mint and you dont see many of them at all ever really. I understand what he said completely in such sought out cards such as these.

I dont see many bgs 9.5s with these cards at all on the market so Im guessing they dont grade them 9.5s for shits and giggles because there are in fact very very few of them. So I figure getting a Gem Mint status on cards that you dont find in Gem Mint adds good value to that card coming from a trusted grading company.

And yea, when you send them in for regrade sometimes and a few come back 10s sometimes from psa, like kingpokemon stated, that is certainly “comparable” and catches my interest. Thank you everyone for your input!