Let’s say $3000 buys you either a PSA 10 Unltd Base Zard, or a PSA 7 First Ed Zard. Which do you take? And is what you choose for value, personal taste, or other?
I am torn on this one personally, but I think I go First Ed since…First Ed, but passing on a 10 makes me feel a little stupid. Generally curious how the collectors who have been doing this for years think. Thanks for indulging me.
In this specific case I´d go for the first edition as it´s literally the most iconic card in the hobby. In almost every other case I´d go for the better condition (higher grade).
This precisely. In most cases, I want a crisp front on my card with as minimal blemishes as possible, but in the Charizard camp it’s just more iconic and better value to have in the long run. Though I usually only would want PSA 8 and up in my personal collection, I’d be alright with a PSA 7 1st edition Charizard for sure.
Me personally I rather have 1st edition even ungraded cards over 9 or 10 unlimited cards. Maybe I’m dumb but I rather have a PSa 5 1st edition or raw in that quality over a higher grade unlimited and this goes for any set not just base but that’s just me and I like the card over the money. The card feels naked or out of place without the little first edition stamp. I know it’s dumb but I grew up with 1st edition and loved it from first site as a kid
I’m glad I’m not the only one that doesn’t mind light played. I just don’t get ones with crease’s or bends or significant damage. Some back whitening is fine by me as long as front is clean or very close
1st edition (or shadowless) is aways going to win out for me with base just because of how much better I like the shadowless card design. I like the more classic look without the shadow, and the colors are so much richer and more accurate. With later WotC sets, when we’re just talking about a stamp, then I don’t care so much.