For those of us who are in far away countries from the US, we gotta search for vendors who got several cards to avoid paying $25 for each. I know that struggle .
I still feel like plenty of things are still very cheap. One day in the future we are going to look back on sub $1k EX Holo prices and wish we bought more.
In my eyes almost everything is still real cheap. When compared to how old and historical some of the sets they come from are. Itâs all about the eye of the beholder.
Iâd go off the Japanese set release which would be English #11,#17,#4 thatâs how I would define the ârookieâ personally
Iâd argue #10 isnât the correct rookie card
Edit:
In terms of rookie card everything will come from Japanese releases, promos wouldnât be considered a rookie card. To determine the Neo set you just have to look at the Neo Premium File.
I just went by earlier card # in the set. They could both be considered rookie cards, I think â they were released at the same time, in the same set.
This is the pop report for these, there are a lot of set collectors and if there are 100 people going for 9 cards it will be a lot more expensive than 100 people going for 88 cards. Even in 9 the card is incredibly hard to grade. On top of that this typhlosion is more popular, t17 looks more alive. It might also be more popular because it is more expensive, but the main point is that T17 is way harder to grade than T18.
Have there been any significant offers on T17?
Even psa has the 10 at $60k+
And those numbers more âconservativeâ there.
Lugia started selling around $12-13k in 2020 and almost 10copies have been sold in the meantime and weâre now at a 6figure card.
Still no new T17 sale tho with all that money being thrown aroundâŠ
A rookie card is a first release of a card, t17 and t18 were released at the same time. The number system is simply a numerical ordering system for a set.
Iâm not saying either answer is wrong, itâs more of a though experiment.
A rookie card is quite literally the first released card to feature the subject, it has nothing to do with popularity or value. Collectors can choose what they wish to collect, sellers can market however theyâd like, but the definition of what a rookie card is doesnât change.
This is false. There are numerous athletes whose rookies are not the literal first release. Mainly because there are multiple brands with multiple releases. Modern is even more complicated, as there are 100s of ârookieâ cards and the one that ends up being the standout is either the rarest and/or most popular. Not the literal first released.
I always assumed ârookie cardâ originated from sports cards; any card featuring an athlete in their rookie season would be a rookie card. I like Scottâs definition here, though Pokemon donât have a ârookie season,â so the standard may not me an exact comparison.