Our favorite amateur boxer Pauls Pokémon NFT tanked

100% this. The fact is that celebrities have influence. And people with influence should wield it responsibly. A celebrity advising his/her audience to “invest” in NFTs is highly irresponsible (and unethical, IMO).

5 Likes

It’s lunch time here. I’ll keep this short.
Those examples outlined above are industries that are heavily regulated. This means there are tight rules about what companies and individuals can and cannot do. Regulations can’t and certainly don’t fix everything. But they are there to help people be both safer or at worst, be better informed. Can the same be said for NFTs?

Back to LP though.
There was definitely negligence in the way LP presented his NFTs to his followers.An extremely large portion of Pokemon’s demographic is children. Yet there he is spruiking his adjacent products as investments and implanting the idea that NFTs are the next gold rush.
I don’t recall hearing him warning minors against purchasing or participating etc. Yet he would have to expect that young and impressionable minds were watching. They are what make up a huge amount of his followers.
The whole cross promotion thing was gross.

13 Likes

Uhm no. As long as people can do what they want and not be directed by hisoka then I’m good.

I mean, if you cant mislead your fans into giving you millions, what is the point in being a celebrity?

18 Likes

I think this discussion has more than run its course.

18 Likes