Many of the Pokemon playtest cards were likely printed in 2024

Maybe I need to clarify all the information to this point.

Alpha prototypes

  • there are no yellow tracking dots since they were printed in b&w
  • 2 variants, we can call them HQ and LQ: Many of the Pokemon playtest cards were likely printed in 2024 - #8 by pfm
  • easily distinguished by the background
  • there is one set of HQ, all other copies appear to be LQ
  • LQ appear to be copies of HQ, as they pick up the same printing artifacts seen on the HQ version.

HQ: inconclusive.
LQ: likely a copy of HQ, when the copy was made is inconclusive.

Alpha prototypes

High quality back: dated to 1996 for the three starters
Alpha pattern only: inconclusive.
Double dot pattern: all observed copies so far have 2024 dots

Beta playtest

  • two variants, HQ and LQ: Many of the Pokemon playtest cards were likely printed in 2024 - #299 by pfm
  • HQ has yet to be observed with any dots
  • LQ has always been observed with 2024 dots
  • there only only appears to be 1 HQ beta per Pokemon, implying the vast majority of betas have 2024 dots
  • HQ betas have subtle traces of the alpha pattern on the back, suggesting that the HQ beta back was scanned/copied from a card that has the alpha print pattern - this implies the HQ betas were printed after the alphas and the authenticity is contingent on the authenticity of the alphas: Many of the Pokemon playtest cards were likely printed in 2024 - #745 by pfm
  • it is unlikely that the LQ are simply scans/copies of HQ given that not a single print artifact or dirt spec has yet been observed to be transferred from HQ to LQ

HQ beta: inconclusive
LQ beta: all observed copies so far have 2024 dots

Delta prototypes and Alpha presentation

  • I haven’t said too much about these yet but so far they all look similar to LQ beta and all observed copies so far have 2024 dots

Beta presentation

  • No hi-res scan available yet, but I see no evidence of dots so far
  • They match well with the corocoro images and the print quality suggests a different printer was used for these than anything mentioned so far
  • inconclusive so far
68 Likes