I find it interesting that their wording has specifically been “determined to be not authentic” as opposed to be “could not be confirmed as authentic”. For those who sent in cards without known date code dots, did cgc use the same wording? Because there is an assumption that some could be real but i wonder if they will ever be clear on their retest methods to confirm they are not authentic or if this is how they avoid it all again, by supporting an insurance funded buyback.